Thursday, 17 October 2013

Miscellaneous Arguments



-R. v. Chaulk; A case which involved a young Robert Chaulk who broke into a man’s house and bludgeoned the owner to death. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity and was later deemed sane 4 months later. After his release he stabbed then beat his two neighbours on New Year’s Day. Cases like this demonstrate a less than effective Canadian rehabilitation program with a high recidivism rate. If the death penalty were in effect this horrible crime could be stopped and repeat offenders like Robert Chaulk wouldn’t kill again.

-The death penalty can help police gather more information pertaining to a crime through plea bargains.


-It is effective in ending repeat violent offenders. Although the inmates with life imprisonment terms may not be a danger to society they can be very dangerous to other inmates and prison guards. Violent offenders account for a large population of prison gangs who are known to organize and carry out attacks on prison guards and other prisoners.


No comments:

Post a Comment